Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20500 (KAR)

M/S VARNIKA v. SRI A A PRASANNA KUMAR

CRL.RP/275/2021 · 2026-06-11

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28140 CRL.RP No. 275 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.275 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1. M/S. VARNIKA, NO.73, FIRST FLOOR, ELEPHANT ROCK ROAD, JAYANAGAR 3RD BLOCK, BENGALURU, REP. BY ITS PARTNER, VISHWANATH K.S. 2. SRI VISHWANATH K.S., S/O SUBRAMANYAM K.V., AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS. 3. SRI SUBRAMANYAM K.V., S/O VISHWANATH SETTY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS. BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.512, 20TH MAIN, 36TH CROSS, 4TH “T” BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K. SHRIDHARA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI. A.A. PRASANNA KUMAR, M/S. SREE LAKSHMI JEWELLERS, R/AT NO.1130/21, 26TH MAIN, Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28140 CRL.RP No. 275 of 2021 4TH “T” BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. KAMALA N.K., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION PASSED BY THE XVI ACMM, BENGALURU ON 11.01.2018 IN C.C.NO.2843/2014 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHBLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2020 PASSED IN CRL.A.213/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE LVI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-57), BENGALURU WHERE THE APPELLANT COURT HAS CONFIRMED THE ORDER OF CONVICTION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the revision petitioners is absent. 2. This Court vide order dated 11.08.2021 suspended the sentence, subject to depositing 450% of the fine amount, inclusive of amount, if any, before the Trial Court within a period of eight weeks and the same has not been complied with. This matter is of the year 2021 and not yet admitted. Hence, the question of - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28140 CRL.RP No. 275 of 2021 considering the revision petition does not arise, in view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this Court. 3. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2