Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20495 (BOM)

JANABAI EKNATH KHATAL (SINCE DECD.) THROUGH HIS LRS. v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ANR.

WP/5354/2019 · 2026-10-14

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

4-WP-5354-2019.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5354 OF 2019 Janabai Eknath Khatal (since Decd.) Through Lr. ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector, Osmanabad And Another ...Respondents —————— Mr. Sachin Bhavan i/b Mr. Govind Solanke, for the Petitioner. Mr. Rajan Pawar, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : OCTOBER 14, 2026 P. C. : 1. The limited grievance in the present Petition is for direction to the Respondent authorities to consider the claim dated 15th November, 2011 of the Petitioner filed under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short “Land Acquisition Act”). 2. Perusal of the record would indicate that the Petitioner had filed an application under Section 28(3) of the Land Acquisition Act for enhancement of compensation and the contention is that the same remains undecided till date. 3. In light of the above, the Petition is disposed of by directing the Respondents to adjudicate the Petitioner’s claim expeditiously, and in Arya Chavan 1 of 2 2026:BHC-KOL:9964-DB 4-WP-5354-2019.doc any event, within a period of 12 weeks from today, if not decided. 4. Applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Arya Chavan 2 of 2