Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20492 (KAR)

C. SUNDARAM, v. RENUKARADHYA A

CRL.A/1487/2023 · 2026-06-11

S Rachaiah

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28152 CRL.A No. 1487 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1487 OF 2023 (A) BETWEEN: C. SUNDARAM, S/O CHOCKALINGAM, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT: NO.49/24, 11TH C CROSS, VYALIKAVAL, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. TEJESH K.B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: RENUKARADHYA A S/O ANAND KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/AT: NO.70, SONNENAHALLI, KOLIGERE POST-561 204, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S 378(4) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.03.2023 PASSED BY THE XV ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN CC NO.26739/2017 BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SUSHMA LAKSHMI B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28152 CRL.A No. 1487 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S RACHAIAH ORAL JUDGMENT Case called out. None appears for the appellant. 2. Despite giving sufficient opportunity, the appellant has not complied with the office-objections. 3. Hence, the criminal appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office-objections. Sd/- (S RACHAIAH) JUDGE NR/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6