Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2049 (RAJ)

MOHD. ZIYAUDDIN S/O MOHD. RAFIK v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6591/2026 · 2026-04-10

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15125] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6591/2026 Mohd. Ziyauddin S/o Mohd. Rafik, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Rangpur, Kota, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Mission Director, National Health Mission, Directorate Of Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Nhm Headquarter, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini a/w Mr. Aamir Khan. For Respondent(s) : -- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN Order 10/04/2026 1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is heard on final disposal. 2. The present writ petition has been filed being aggrieved of termination of the services of the petitioner, who is working on the post of Medical Officer on UTB basis. The petitioner’s grievance is that the petitioner is being replaced by regular employees. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the decision of a co- [2026:RJ-JP:15125] (2 of 2) [CW-6591/2026] ordinate Bencvh of this Court in Dr. Amit Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4231/2025) passed on 01.04.2025. Operation portion of the order dated 01.04.2025 passed in the case of Dr. Amit Sharma (supra) reads as follows:- “5. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners against the vacant posts (if any) in case, the respondents desire to take the services of the petitioner, till regularly selected candidates are available to them.” 4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms as passed in the case of Dr. Amit Sharma (supra). 5. All the pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 21-Mohan/