Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20489 (BOM)

VISHNU SOPANRAO PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/4453/2024 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

936-APPLN-4453-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4453 OF 2024 Vishnu Sopanrao Pawar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. K. A. Pathade h/f Mr. P P More, Advocate for Applicant Mrs. R. R. Tandale, APP for Respondent No. 1 Mr. A. A. Fulfagar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2 (appointed) CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J DATE :OCTOBER 13, 2026 P. C. : 1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the Application with liberty to file discharge application before Sessions Court. 2. In view of this, Application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed, if charge is not framed. 3. Considering the efforts taken by learned appointed Counsel for Respondent No.2, his fees is quantified @ Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only). (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani p. 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48583-DB