MOHAMMED AFZAL S/O JABBAR MOHAMMED v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16252/2025 · 2026-01-30
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20485 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20485 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4460] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16252/2025 Mohammed Afzal S/o Jabbar Mohammed, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kayampura, Tehsil And District Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rinesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Sharma, P.P. Mr. Vinod Kumar Tamoliya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 30/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No. 337/2025 registered with the Police Station Christianganj, District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 in F.I.R. and against the order dated 29.11.2025 whereby learned Trial Court dismissed the bail application filed by the accused-petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 352, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and
learned counsel for the complainant.
3.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that
[2026:RJ-JP:4460] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16252/2025] with the motivation of the elderly persons and the relatives the parties have entered into compromise. He also submits that accused-petitioner is always ready to join and cooperate in the investigation. He further submits that none of the injury sustained by the complainant party has been opined to be dangerous to life.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
5.
Learned counsel for the complainant verified the fact of compromise in between the parties.
6. Taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that parties have entered into compromise, this Court deems just and proper to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. The S.H.O./I.O./Arresting Authority, Police Station Christianganj, District Ajmer in F.I.R. No. 337/2025 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner he shall be released on bail, provided of him furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- (I). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts
[2026:RJ-JP:4460] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16252/2025] to the Court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /247