- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28209 W.P. No.25281/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.25281/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PARVATHAMMA W/O CHANNAIAH AGED 73 YEARS. 2. SRI. C.S. SATHISH S/O LATE CHANNAIAH AGED 43 YEARS. 3. SMT. DAKSHAYINI W/O C.S. SATHISH AGED 34 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT ITTAMADU VILLAGE BIDADI HOBLI RAMANAGARA TALUK AND DISTRICT – 562109. 4. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O D.N. RAMAKRISHNA AGED 51 YEARS R/AT NO.48-A, PRASAD STREET DANKANIKOTE TALUK KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT TAMILNADU – 635107. 5. SMT. SUNANDA D/O LATE CHANNAPPA AGED 48 YEARS R/AT. DODDASADANAHALLI HAROHALLI HOBLI KANAKAPURA TALUK RAMANAGARA DIST – 562117. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAMU H.C. ADV.,) Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28209 W.P. No.25281/2022 AND: 1. SMT. PARVATHI S. HEGDE W/O SUBRAYA V. HEGDE AGED 72 YEARS. 2. SMT. SUJATHA W/O VISHNU HEGDE AGED 46 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT P14/28 8TH MAIN, BTM LAYOUT 1ST STAGE, BANGALORE – 560029. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE NOT ISSUED FOR RESPONDENTS FOR WANT OF PF, ETC.,) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS IN EX.835/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE XL ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-41), BANGALORE. QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN EX. NO.835/2016 ON IA.NO 4, ANNEXURE-F DATED 30.06.2022 AT ANNEXURE G, BY XL ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-41) AT BANGALORE, CONSEQUENTLY TO DISMISS THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition which reads as under: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28209 W.P. No.25281/2022 “The Petitioner most respectfully submits as follows: The present writ petition was filed challenging the order passed by the Trial Court directing attachment of the subject property. Subsequently, during the pendency of the proceedings, the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled before the Trial Court and the issue involved in the present writ petition no longer survives for consideration. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and as the grievance raised in the writ petition has already been redressed, the Petitioner does not wish to prosecute the present writ petition any further. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition as not pressed and pass such other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. In view of the aforesaid memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE ABK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2