APHC010220292024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11276/2024 Between: 1. R NAGA TULASI, , W/O R NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.5-226, KARAKAMBADI VILLAGE RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RENIGUNTA POLICE STATION, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, KARAKAMBADI VILLAGE, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE KARAKAMBADI PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KARAKAMBADI, RENIGUNTA MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. T DHANUNJAYA REDDY, S/O. TV. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 2-14, PENAGALURU VILLAGE, 2 PENAGALURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. K NARAYANA SWAMY, S/O K. JAYARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-14, PENAGALURU VILLAGE, PENAGALURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. K KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O SEETHARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.2-14, PENAGALURU VILLAGE PENAGALURU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. TH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SANAGA ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT 3. GP FOR REVENUE 4. ADARSHITHA KILARU 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11276/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue the order or orders direction more particularly one in nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent forced the petitioner and others to vacate their properties by sold to the 6th to 8th respondents for meagre price, is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to pressurize the petitioner to sell her property to the 6th to 8th respondents for meager price and not to vacate the petitioner from her house an extent of Ac.0- 02 cents with Door No.5-342 with assessment No.6645 in survey No.547/1 of Karakambadi Village, Renigunta Mandal, Tirupati District, without following due process of law.…” 2. Heard Sri Sanaga Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and forcing the petitioner to sell her property. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11276/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS