Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20478 (RAJ)

RAJESH S/O BABULAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16309/2025 · 2026-01-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3379] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16309/2025 Rajesh S/o Babulal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Muie, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 452/2026 Rakesh Kumar Son Of Shri Premraj, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Aadalwara Kalan, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (At Present Confined At Central Jail Sawai Madhopur) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Suman Meena W/o Rajesh Mr. Kashi Ram Meena U/o Rakesh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/01/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 173/2025 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for offences punishable u/S 318(4), 319(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Ms. Suman Meena and Mr. Kashi Ram Meena, the wife and uncle of the accused petitioners are present in person. They [2026:RJ-JP:3379] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16309/2025] submit that the accused petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They further submit that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and no other criminal case is pending against the accused petitioners. They further submit that the accused petitioners are in custody for about three months. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the accused petitioners and so also the fact that no other criminal case is pending against the accused petitioners and they are in custody for about three months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. A copy of this order be placed in connected file/s. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /33-34