1 ( 2026:HHC:34755 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 643 of 2026 Decided on: 18.08.2026 ________________________________________________ Madhu Mati Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Ors. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 17.08.2026, wherein, it has been stated that case of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the Deputy Director of School Education, Bilaspur, by way of passing a detailed speaking order, vide order dated 17.08.2026. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:34755 ) 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the present contempt petition, if occasion arises to do so. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 18th August,, 2026 Judge (raman)