Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20475 (CAL)

PRATIMA BHAGAT v. CESC LTD. ANDV ORS.

WPA/11772/2021 · 2026-05-15

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

M/L.118. May 15, 2026. KAUSHIK WPA No. 11772 of 2021 CAN 1 of 2022 Pratima Bhagat Vs. CESC Ltd. & Ors. Mr. Bhagbat Chowdhury Ms. Paromita Moitra … for the petitioner Mr. Debanjan Mukherjee … for the CESC Ltd. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against wrongful and illegal encroachment upon the property of the petitioner by the private respondent. The writ petition was filed in the year 2021 and has been adjourned from time to time. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner, upon instruction, that they do not want to proceed with the writ petition and have availed of alternative remedy by filing a civil suit. CESC is represented. In view of the above, WPA 11772 of 2021 along with connected interlocutory application stands dismissed. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to take necessary steps, if so advised, in view of any subsequent event, which may emerge in the pending civil suit. 2 Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)