Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20473 (KAR)

P V VAGDEVI v. RUKMINI B

MFA/2892/2022 · 2026-06-09

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27598 MFA No. 2892 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2892 OF 2022 (CPC) BETWEEN: P.V. VAGDEVI W/O. LATE SUBRAMANYA K.S. D/O. K.P. VENTARAMANA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT #42, 'ANADNA NILAYA' 19TH 'C' CROSS, 15TH MAIN ROAD PADMANABHANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 070. PRESENTLY CAMPING AT #30 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN SARVABHOUMANGARA CHIKKALLASANDRA BENGALURU - 560 061. REPRESENTED BY HER BROTHER AND POWER OF ATTORNEY PAVAN KUMAR P.V. S/O. K.P. VENKATARAMANA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.30 3RD CROSS, 2ND MAIN SARVABHOUMANGARA CHIKKALLASANDRA BENGALURU - 560 061. …APPELLANT (BY SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. RUKMINI B W/O. LATE K.M. SRINIVSA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27598 MFA No. 2892 of 2022 R/AT #42, 'ANANDA NILAYA' 19TH 'C' CROSS 15TH MAIN ROAD PADMANABHANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 070. 2. SANDHYA S/O. LATE K.M. SRINIVAS AGED 45 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.101 SRIHARI KRUPA. 3RD MAIN, 4TH PHASE KATRIGUPPE BANASHANKARI III STAGE BENGALURU - 560 004. 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER INDO STAR CAPITAL FINANCE LTD. ABOVE DHANALAKSHMI BANK NO. 13, 4TH FLOOR CRN CHAMBERS KASTURBA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. 4. THE BRANCH MANGER ICICI BANK NO. 1101, 24TH MAIN ROAD TMC LAYOUT, 1ST PHASE J.P. NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 078. 5. THE BRANCH MANGER HDFC BANK NO. 2934 AND 5E, 1ST FLOOR MAGADI CHORD ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. 6. THE BRANCH MANAGER HDFC LIFE ISNRUANCE CORPORATION LIMITED NO. 235/22, 2ND FLOOR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27598 MFA No. 2892 of 2022 'SJUBAHSREE AVENUE' 3RD BLOCK, 9TH MAIN ROAD JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SUNIL S, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2; SRI M.E. MADHUSUDHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R6; R3, R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLIII RULE 1(R) OF CPC SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.03.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.3632/2021 ON THE FILE OF VII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU BY ALLOWING THIS APPEAL AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the appeal on the ground that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and a compromise petition has been entered into between them. Placing the memo on record, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27598 MFA No. 2892 of 2022 In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending interlocutory application, if any, does not survive for consideration and the same pales into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1