APHC010211212014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 39873 OF 2014 Between: 1. G.SRINIVAS, S/O. G. SUBASH CHANDRA BOSE, R/O. 367/4, MADURA WADA, VISHAKAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. GVMC COMMISSIONER VSP ANOT, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER VISAKHAPATNAM 2. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleaed to issue an approprate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the building permission for residential purpose in lands in Survey No. 367/4 of Madura Wada Village, Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation to the petitioner for construction of residential building consisting to basement for parking and ground floor and 5 upper floors as illegal, null , void and arbitrary and consequently direct the 1 st Respondent to release the approved building permission to the Petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 50002 OF 2014 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to release the approved building permision for residential purpose in lands in Survey No. 367/4 of Madura Wada Village, Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation to the Petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. R A CHARY(SC FOR MC KAR NIZ) 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: None for the Writ Petitioner. 2. This Court has recorded default on the part of the Writ Petitioner on 04.11.2024 and gave a direction to the Registry to list this Writ Petition under the caption for dismissal. 3. Today also, even on second call, none appears for the Writ Petitioner. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 28.01.2026 Mnr 4 125 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 39873 OF 2014 Dt: 28.01.2026 Mnr