[2026:RJ-JP:4371] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16453/2025 1. Sattar S/o Imrat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gadhi Jheelpatti, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Raju S/o Rajjak, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Gadhi Jheelpatti, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16454/2025 Mursalim S/o Aayat, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Gadhi Jhilpatti, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Mr. Surendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 30/01/2026 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.181/2025 registered at [2026:RJ-JP:4371] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16453/2025] Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Sattar S/o Imrat, 2. Raju S/o Rajjak and 3. Mursalim S/o Aayat, in connection with FIR No.181/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before [2026:RJ-JP:4371] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16453/2025] the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/84-85