Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20464 (KAR)

M/S SHREE JYOTHI EUDCATION TRUST v. M/S THIRUMENI FINANCE PVT LTD

CRL.RP/382/2026 · 2026-06-10

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28223 CRL.RP No. 382 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 382 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. M/S SHREE JYOTHI EUDCATION TRUST M/S. SHRI LAKSHMI RANGANATH PRIMARY SCHOOL,SULIKERE VILLAGE, BADAMI TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT - 587205 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY ASHOK R KOLLI 2. SRI. ASHOK R. KOLLI S/O RANGAPPA KOLLI, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, SULIKERE VILLAGE, BADAMI TALUK, BAGALKOT DISTRICT - 587205 REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K GURUDHATTA,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S THIRUMENI FINANCE PVT LTD (VARTHANA) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT IS PRESS BUILDING, BANERJI ROAD, COCHIN-682 018, HEAD OFFICE AT HRBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU – 560 043 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SRI. NIKHILESH U …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PATIL J M,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28223 CRL.RP No. 382 of 2026 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TOa) SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED XIV ADDL SCJ AND ACMM, MEMBER AND THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (SCCH-10) AT BANGALORE IN CC.NO.5369/2019 DTD 19.02.2019 AND THE JUDGEMENT PASSED BY THE LEARNED LVIII ADDL. CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-59) BANGALORE IN CRL.A.NO.734/2021 DTD 24.09.2025 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 06.04.2026 has suspended the sentence subject to revision petitioner depositing 50% of the fine amount (inclusive of the amount already in deposit) on or before 28.04.2026 and the said order was not complied with. Again, the matter was listed on 29.04.2026 and on that day, there is no representation on behalf of revision petitioner and the matter adjourned to 10.06.2026. In the meanwhile, learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed an application on 08.06.2026 seeking for extension of time to comply with the conditional order dated 06.04.2026 but he - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28223 CRL.RP No. 382 of 2026 has not produced any document to show that if any amount is deposited. 2. Though time was granted till 28.04.2026, the revision petitioner has not complied with the aforesaid conditional order passed by this Court. As such, no reason is assigned to extend the time for compliance of the said conditional order. Moreover, the revision is not yet admitted and only sentence is suspended conditionally. Accordingly, the criminal revision petition stands dismissed in view of non-compliance of the said conditional order. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6