[2026:RJ-JP:5209] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20094/2025 Sagar Sarwan Son Of Late Shri Mukesh Kumar Sarwan, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of House No. 83, Santosh Nagar, Majdoor Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Bank Of Maharashtra, Through Deputy General Manager, Hrm, Head Office, Lokmangal, Shivaji Nagar, Pune (Maharashtra) 2. Deputy Zonal Manager, Bank Of Maharashtra, Office At 6Th Floor, Fortune Heights Ahimsa Circle, Ashok Nagar, C- Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek with Mr. Pranav Pareek, Mr. Kshitiz Sharma & Mr. Rajeshwari Jhala For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 04/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that father of the petitioner, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sarwan, was holding the post of Peon in respondent-Bank, however, quite unfortunately, while he was in service with respondent-Bank died on 12.11.2021. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that soon after one application for seeking compassionate appointment was moved by the petitioner, which was also forwarded by the Branch Officer to the Office of Deputy Zonal Manager vide order dated 14.09.2023, however, till this date, the application has not [2026:RJ-JP:5209] (2 of 2) [CW-20094/2025] been decided. He also submits that the sole object of Scheme of compassionate appointment is to provide immediate financial relief to the family of deceased government servant, who died while leaving entire family in deep financial crisis. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that respondents are sitting tight over the application submitted by the petitioner and delay in deciding the same is causing grave prejudice and miscarriage of justice to the petitioner. 4. In the light of above submissions, the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage with the direction to the respondent No.2 to consider and decide the application for compassionate appointment submitted by the petitioner expeditiously but not later than four weeks from the date of receipt of representation along with certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that no opinion on merits has been expressed by this Court in this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/44