- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27205 RFA No. 443 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.443 OF 2016 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. MESSRS HI-TECH INTERNATIONAL REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER, MR. SIDHARTH SAREEN, WITH ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.B-11, OPP. POWER HOUSE, JAMALPUR, BEHIND BRAILE BHAVAN, CHANDIGARH ROAD, LUDHIANA-141 010 PUNJAB. 2. MR. SIDHARTH SAREEN AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, PARTNER OF MESSRS HI-TECH INTERNATIONAL, WITH ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.B-11, OPP. POWER HOSUE, JAMALPUR, BEHIND BRAILE BHAVAN, CHANDIGARH ROAD, LUDHIANA-141010. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. REGO L P E., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by V MANJUSHA BAI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27205 RFA No. 443 of 2016 AND: 1. MESSRS SUPER BRIGHT ENGINEERING CO., REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. KAMAL SINGH BHUTORIA, NO.38, 2ND CROSS, C.K.C. GARDEN, BANGALORE-560027. 2. MR. KAMAL SINGH BHUTORIA SON OF LATE HEMAJ JI BHUTORIA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, PROPRIETOR OF MESSRS SUPER BRIGHT ENGINEERING CO., NO.38, 2ND CROSS, C.K.C. GARDEN, BANGALORE-560027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. ARUN PONAPPA, ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC., 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN O.S. NO.2185/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, C.C.H. NO.42 AND AFTER DUE CONSIDERATION OF THE SAME AND THE SUBMISSIONS MADE BY THE APPELLANTS AT THE TIME OF FINAL HEARING BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.12.2015 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XLI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE CITY, C.C.H.NO.42 AND GRANT TO THE APPELLANTS THEIR COSTS COUNSEL'S FEE AND SUCH FURTHER OR OTHER RELIEF AS THE HON'BLE COURT FEELS DEEMED FIT AS THE NATURE OF THE CASE REQUIRES. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27205 RFA No. 443 of 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. A money suit has been decreed in favour of the plaintiffs/respondents, against which the present appeal is filed by the defendants. An interim order was passed by this Court subject to deposit of certain amounts by the appellants before this Court and the appellants have deposited a sum of Rs.2,25,000/- before this Court. 2. During the course of the proceedings, at the intervention of friends and well-wishers, the appellants and respondents have compromised the case and they have filed a joint memo dated 08.06.2026 and both pray that the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the joint memo. The joint memo is taken on record. 3. Respondent No.1 is present before the Court. The authorized representative of the appellants has appeared through video conference and both are identified by their respective advocates. Both the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the respondents once again pray that the appeal may be disposed of terms of the joint memo. Hence, the following:- - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27205 RFA No. 443 of 2016 ORDER i. The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the joint memo. ii. The respondents shall be entitled to withdraw a sum of Rs.2,25,000/- deposited by the appellants along with accrued interest thereon. They shall also be entitled to refund of the Court fee, if permissible in law. iv. Registry is directed to draw a decree in terms of the joint memo and do the needful. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9