Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20459 (DEL)

DEEPAK SINGH DUHAN v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

W.P.(C)/13045/2026 · 2026-09-29

Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, Sanjay Sharma

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010422982026 + W.P.(C) 13045/2026 DEEPAK SINGH DUHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, SPC and Mr. Ayush Saxena, GP. Mr. Ajay Pal Law Officer, Inspector Athurv, CRPF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY SHARMA O R D E R % 29.09.2026 CM APPL. 67540/2026 (Seeking disposal of petition) 1. Heard. 2. The relief prayer in the writ petition is for quashing and setting aside the Medical Report dated 24th August, 2026 of the respondent no.3/Review Medical Board by virtue of which, candidature of the petitioner was disqualified on the account of Phimosis as the petitioner was found to be unfit for recruitment for the post of Sub Inspector (Hindi Translator) 2025. 3. The applicant had moved the application claiming that a post be kept This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:29:59 vacant as he has a better prospect of getting selected and appointed against the post as he has already been selected and the medical condition in the report cannot be considered at first against his interest, particularly, having regard to the order of Division Bench of this Court in the matter of “Manish Kasana v. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) 7392/2022, decided on 13th May, 2022. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner categorically stated that the petitioner has already undergone two surgeries and the documents to that effect are already submitted to the respondent. 5. In the aforesaid background, we deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondent to consider the contentions of the petitioner as regards, he having undergone the surgery, in the light of observations made by the Division Bench of this court in the order of Manish Kasana (supra). 6. Let the decision taken by the respondent, if so required, by making the petitioner appear before the Medical Board, be communicated within four weeks from today. 7. In case, if the petitioner is found fit, the respondent shall proceed ahead with the process of issuing appointment order provided, the petitioner qualifies other requisite conditions. 8. In case, the order is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, liberty to take such remedy is permissible and as available in law. 9. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 13045/2026 10. In view of the order passed in CM APPL. 67540/2026, the writ petition stands disposed of. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:29:59 11. Pending application(s), if any, is disposed of. 12. The date already fixed i.e., 28th October, 2026, stands cancelled. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J SANJAY SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 29, 2026/rk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2026 at 11:29:59