[2026:RJ-JP:3415] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16341/2025 Lokesh Kumar S/o Nanagram, R/o Rupwas, P.S. Bandikui, Dis- trict Dausa (At present confined in Sub-Jail Bandikui). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 23/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.363/2025 registered at Police Station Bandikui (Dausa), District Dausa (Raj.) for offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology Act, 2008. During the course of investigation, offence under Section 238(c) of BNS, 2023 has also been added against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that co-accused namely- Suresh Chand and Vishram have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since [2026:RJ-JP:3415] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16341/2025] 22.11.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that co-accused namely- Suresh Chand and Vishram have already been granted benefit of bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Lokesh Kumar S/o Nanagram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /79