1 2026:CGHC:22554 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 883 of 2023 Manish Parte S/o Late Shri Bhaiya Lal Parte Aged About 48 Years Sole Proprietor Of M/s Parte Highway Services, H.P. Petrol Pump, N.H.43, Village Telisemra, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, R/o Jhuniapara, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Union Of India Through The Secretary, The Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Road, New Delhi- 110001. 2 - The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (A Govt. Of India Enterprise) Registered Office 17, Jamshedaji Tata Road, Mumbai (M.H.) Pin-400020. 3 - The Chief Regional Manager And Duly Constituted Attorney M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Retail Office, 4th Floor, Lic, Investment Building, Phase-2, Opposite Epf Office, Pandri, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Superintendent Of Police Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 5 - The Station House Officer Bodhghat, Police Station Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 6 - Shri Saket Jha S/o Shri Kamal Dev Jha Aged About 30 Years R/o 196, Guru Ghasidas Marg, Dhanteshwari Ward, Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh 7 - Shri Bali Nagwanshi S/o Shri Buter Nagwanshi Aged About 54 Years R/o 87, Sun City, Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukharjee Ward, 39, Jagdalpur, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.05.14 10:17:58 +0530 2 8 - The General Administration Department (G.A.D.) Through The Principal Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, State Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Sameer Behar, Advocate For State : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Govt. Advocate For Respective Respondents : Mr. Ali Asgar and Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocates Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 13.05.2026 1 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner has expired and, on account thereof, he is not having any further instructions in the matter. 2 Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection to the aforesaid submission. 3 In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the petitioner and considering the fact that no one has come forward to prosecute the matter further, this Court is not inclined to keep the present petition pending. 4 Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed for want of instructions. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh