Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20452 (KAR)

MR.M. RAJU v. MR H B THAMMEGOWDA, SINCE DEAD HIS LR'S SMT. YASHODAMMA

CRL.RP/270/2025 · 2026-06-11

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28146 CRL.RP No. 270 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.270 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. MR. M. RAJU, S/O LATE K. MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT KENDAGANNASWAMY NILAYA, 3RD CROSS, RAJEEV NAGARA, MAHADESHWARA COLLEGE ROAD, KOLLEGALA TOWN AND TALUK, CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT-571440. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR. H.B. THAMMEGOWDA, SINCE DEAD HIS LR'S SMT. YASHODAMMA, W/O LATE H.B.THAMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. 2. MR. T.V.AVINASH, S/O LATE H.B.THAMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/AT HADLAHALLI VILLAGE, SAKALESHAPURA TALUK, HASANA DISTRICT -573211. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28146 CRL.RP No. 270 of 2025 3. MRS. T.V. AKSHATHA, D/O LATE H.B.THAMMEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/AT NO.320, 4TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS, J.P.NAGAR, 4TH STAGE, BENGALURU-560078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.K. VASANTH, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNNS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 31.05.2023 PASSED BY PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL IN C.C.NO.1075/16 AND THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.01.2025 PASSED BY THE HONBLE ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGARA (SITTING AT KOLLEGALA), IN CRL.A.NO.5004/2024 AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 suspended the sentence, subject to depositing 50% of the fine amount including the amount, if any, already deposited before the Trial Court or the First Appellate Court within four weeks before the Trial Court and the same has not been complied with. This matter is of the year 2025 and not yet admitted. Hence, the question of considering the revision petition does not arise, in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28146 CRL.RP No. 270 of 2025 view of non-compliance of conditional order passed by this Court. 2. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15