AASEEN KHAN S/O SHRI PAPPU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16272/2025 · 2026-01-13
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20449 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20449 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.16272/2025 Aaseen Khan S/o Shri Pappu Khan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Sunderwali Gurjaro Ka Mohalla, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg, Presently Residing At 83, Ishwar Nagar, Police Station Kalwad, Jaipur West (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 13/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.61/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), for the offence(s) under Sections 109(1), 140(3) and 3/5 of B.N.S. and Section3(5)/27 of the Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the recovery of firearm was affected from the other co- accused Bansilal, who has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court vide order dated 20.02.2025 and the other similarly placed co-accused Suresh Gurjar has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 18.06.2025 and
[2026:RJ-JP:1368] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16272/2025] the case of the petitioner is identical to the other co-accused Suresh Gurjar. It is further contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and against him 5 cases under various offences are registered, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record.
5. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case, the main allegation of causing firearm injury is against Bansilal for whom the recovery of firearm was made and he has already been enlarged on bail by the trial Court and the other similarly placed co-accused Suresh Gurjar is also enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 18.06.2025, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Aaseen Khan S/o Shri Pappu Khan, in connection with FIR No.61/2025, registered at Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur City (South), shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
[2026:RJ-JP:1368] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16272/2025]
7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month before the concerned Police Station till conclusion of the trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station is
directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned trial Court every month without any delay. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.
8. The accused-petitioner is directed to submit his present address along with his mobile number to the concerned S.H.O. within 7 days from his release and the concerned S.H.O. shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number he shall submit the same before the concerned S.H.O. and also before the concerned learned trial Court.
9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned S.H.O. for its strict compliance.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-55