Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20449 (BOM)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA v. DAYANAND S/O. BABURAO BADE AND ANR.

CA/8674/2009 · 2026-10-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 287 FIRST APPEAL NO. 96 OF 2017 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VERSUS DAYANAND S/O. BABURAO BADE AND ANR. ... AGP for appellants : Mr. A.D. Wange … WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8674 OF 2009 IN FA/96/2017 ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. Dated : October 08, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants/State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assails the Judgment and award dated 16.2.2008 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmedpur Camp at Udgir in L.A.R. No.64/2006. 3. The learned AGP for appellant/State submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Application, if any, do not survive and is disposed of accordingly. ( SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. ) ssc/ 2026:BHC-AUG:48267