APHC010211082018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9210/2018 Between: 1. M.TEJASWINI, D/O. RAVICHANDRA REDDY,AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC DATA ENTRY OPERATOR (UNDER ORDERS OF REMO (1), O/O. SUB TREASURY OFFICER, BADVEL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIRECTOR, TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT,A.P. IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICE, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB TREASURY OFFICER, BADVEL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TREASURIES AND ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE MANAGING PARTNER, M/S PRAJA CHAITANIYA MAN POWER CONSULTANTIONS (PCMC) KADAPA, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue, a Writ, Order or Orders more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned orders dt 5.2.2016 issued by the 5th respondent and its consequential proceedings No.G2/7400/2015 dt 11.8.2017 issued by the 1st respondent are illegal, null and void unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into services as Data Entry Operator in the 3rd respondent office with all consequential benefits including regularization of services by holding the action of respondents without issuing any notice and opportunity and further without conducting any enquiry as per CCA Rules in terminating the services of a petitioner even after rendering for more than 10 years service in the 3rd respondent office and basing upon the false and baseless allegations is as illegal, arbitrary, casting stigma 2 discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14,16 of the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service by suspending the proceeding dt 11.8.2017 of the 1st respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave for filing of the Counter Affidavit in W.P.No.9210 of 2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH JAGANNATHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9210 of 2018 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasion, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning appearing on behalf of the respondents is in attendance. 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 30th January, 2026 cbn 4 97 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9210 of 2018 30th January, 2026 cbn