Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20448 (JHR)

SUNIL KUMAR MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/310/2024 · 2026-07-17

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21069 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 310 of 2024 Sunil Kumar Mahto & Others ….. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others ….. Opposite Parties ----- CORAM HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate For the O.Ps: Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, A.C to G.A-V ----- 08/17.07.2026 The present contempt application has been filed against the opposite parties alleging wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the order dated 29.01.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 221/2024. 2. On perusal of the record, it appears that all the opposites parties have filed their respective show cause affidavits mentioning therein that in compliance of the aforesaid order of this Court, the candidatures of the petitioners have been considered, however, they have not been found eligible for appointment to the posts of Assistant Teachers. 3. Considering the said fact, there is no need to further proceed with the matter. 4. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is dropped. 5. The present contempt application stands disposed of. 6. The petitioners are however at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of their subsisting grievance(s). Satish/- (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)