ANNA LAXMAN NIKAM v. SATYABHAMABAI BHAGINATH NIKAM AND ANOTHER
CA/2379/2026 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20446 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20446 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CA.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2379 OF 2026 IN RAST 4747 OF 2026 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2380 OF 2026 IN RAST/4747 OF 2026 ANNA LAXMAN NIKAM VERSUS SATYABHAMABAI BHAGINATH NIKAM AND ANOTHER … Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Gaikwad Sanjay N. Advocate for Respondent nos. 1 & 2 : Mrs. Pooja Vijay Langhe CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 07.10.2026 PER COURT :
The applicants seeks to condone delay of 25 days in preferring review application. For that purpose reliance is placed on paragraph nos. 5 to 7 of the application.
2. The application is contested by the respondent. It is contended that deliberately delay has been caused.
3. I do not find any mala fides on the part of the applicant in preferring the review application belatedly. For the reasons stated in the application, delay stands condoned.
4. List Review Application on 27.11.2026.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/- 1/1