Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20444 (CHH)

RAJEEV VERMA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/118/2026 · 2026-05-04

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:20827 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 118 of 2026 1 - Rajeev Verma S/o Jawahar Lal Verma Aged About 59 Years Presently Working On The Post Of Assistant Engineer O/o Sub-Divisional Officer, Pwd (B And R) Sub Dn. Surguja Dist. Jashpur (C.G.) 2 - Puran Chand Dewangan S/o Late Derha Ram Dewangan Aged About 65 Years Ret. Sub Engineer From The Office Of The Executive Engineer, Pwd (B And R) Dn. Champa Dist. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Engineer In Chief Public Works Department Mantralaya, Sector 19 North Block Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer Public Works Department (B And R) Sub. Dn. Surguja, Dist. Jashpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Executive Engineer Pwd (B And R) Dn. Champa Dist. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Ajay Thakre, Advocate For State : Mrs. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 05.05.2026 With the consent of the parties, the case is heard finally. 1. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that petitioners have filed a writ petition bearing WPS No. 535 of 2026 which came up for hearing on 19.01.2026 and was disposed of directing the respondents therein to consider and take decision on the representation submitted by petitioners, however, in the cause title of the said writ petition the description of the petitioners therein was wrongly mentioned and it could not be rectified till the passing of the order i.e. till 19.01.2026. Due to inadvertent, petitioners could not avail the fruitful outcomes of the order passed by this Court in WPS No. 535 of 2026. 2. Learned counsel for respondent- State submits that she is having no objection if the present review petition is allowed by this Court. 3. Review of the order is sought on the ground that parties are not being impleaded or arrayed in the cause title of the said writ petition. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering that the petitioners will not get fruitful outcomes of the order passed by this Court. The writ petition bearing WPS No. 535/2026 is recalled and office is directed to register WPS No. 535 of 2026 in its original number. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- Alfiza (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.05.11 15:15:34 +0530