Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20440 (PNJ)

CHANDNI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/5800/2026 · 2026-05-18

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5800 IN THE (112) CHANDNI A STATE OF H CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. the Constituti directing the o of the petition on their repres 2. submitted tha 11.05.2026 be (Annexure P petition but the 5800-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da NI AND ANOTHER Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Aditya Partap Singh, Advoca (through video conferencing) Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file stitution of India seeking issuance the official respondents No.1 to 3 to etitioners at the hands of respondents N representation dated 11.05.2026 (Anne At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintenden re P-5) raising their grievances as ut the same has not yet been consider JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5800-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  dvocate for the petitioner aryana en filed under Article 226/227 of suance of a writ of mandamus to 3 to protect the life and liberty dents No.4 to 7 and to take action (Annexure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on tendent of Police, Yamunanagar es as mentioned in the present nsidered and no action has been AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5800 taken thereon would be satis Senior Superin representation 3. 4. behalf of the r in due course during the cou 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro  18.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5800-2026 (O&M) (2) ereon. He further submitted that at e satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, Yamunanag tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Hary f the respondents-State and submits course. Let a complete set of the pap he course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 11.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    hat at this stage, the petitioners ns are issued to respondent No.2- unanagar to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. , Haryana, has advance notice on mits that the needful will be done he paperbook be supplied to her r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.