Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20438 (RAJ)

MATASYA FITNESS CENTER v. SHRI SUDHANSHU PANT, I.A.S.

CCP/1345/2025 · 2026-02-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5994] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1345/2025 Matasya Fitness Center, 1148-1447/3178, 1448, Village Tuleda, Opp. Sadar Police Station, District Alwar Through Proprietor Sarvesh Kumar Saini S/o. Sh. Ganga Lehri Saini, Aged 40 Years, R/o. Ramnagar Colony, Near Bus Stand, Rajgarh, Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Sudhanshu Pant, I.a.s., Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Smt. Shuchi Tyagi, I.a.s., Secretary-Cum-Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport And Road Safety, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Shri Jagdish Bairwa, Additional Transport Commissioner, (Rules Cum Registering Authority Fitness Centres, Department Of Transport, Parivahan Bhawan, Jaipur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 5. V. Umashankar, Secretary, Ministry Of Road Transport And Highways, Union Of India, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Khurshid Ahmed Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surendra Singh Naruka, Ms. Ritika Naruka HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/02/2026 It is informed by learned counsel for the respondents that the compliance has already been made. The fact is not controverted by the counsel for the petitioner. Hence, the contempt petition stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/141