APHC010209472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10585/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK FARIDHA BEE,, W/O.KHADER VALI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC HOUSE-WIFE, R/O. DOOR NO.2-114, OPP. NEW MASEED, T. SUNDUPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYAA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP. 2. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KURNOOL RANGE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAYACHOTY RURAL POLICE STATION, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, T.SUNDUPALLE POLICE STATION, T.SUNDUPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. TULASI RAM, S/O NOT KNOWN, OCC CIRCLE INSPECTOR, O/O. RAYACHOTY RURAL POLICE STATION, RAYACHOTY, 2 ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILEYSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. HUSSAIN, , S/O NOT KNOWN, OCC SUB INSPECTOR, O/O. T.SUNDUPALLE POLICE STATION, T.SUNDUPALLE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. SHAIK CHAN BASHA, S/O.MABU SAB, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. POLITICIAN, R/O.D.NO.12-6, AGRAHARAM T SUNDUPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 9. SHAIK SHAMEM, W/O. CHAN BASHA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.12-6, AGRAHARAM T SUNDUPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 10. SHAIK JOHNY BASHA, S/O. CHAN BASHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.D.NO.12-6, AGRAHARAM T SUNDUPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 11. SHAIK SONY, D/O. CHAN BASHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO.12-6, AGRAHARAM T SUNDUPALLE VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 12. RAYAVARAM RAFIK, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC POLITICIAN, R/O. DOOR NO.4-12, RAYAVARAM VILLAGE, T. SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 13. BANDI ESWAR, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC PAID WORKER, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-14, PEDAMADIGAPALLI VILLAGE, T. SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 14. OBULESU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC PAID WORKER, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-14, PEDAMADIGAPALLI VILLAGE, T. SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE KADAPA DISTRICT. 15. RAMESH, S/O NOT KNOWN. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC PAID WORKER, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-14, PEDAMADIGAPALLI VILLAGE, T. SUNDUPALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE 3 KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SANAGA ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MOHAMMAD GHALIB SHAHID 2. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10585/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th to 7th respondents in interfere in boundary disputes between the petitioner and the 8th to 11th respondents which is civil in nature and illegally detained the petitioner hours together and pressurized the petitioner to settle boundary disputes with the 8th to 11th respondents is as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th to 7th respondents in not interfere in boundary disputes between the petitioner and the 8th to 11th respondents which is civil in nature and not pressurized the petitioner to settle boundary disputes with the 8th to 11th respondents.…” 2. Heard Sri Sanaga Ashok Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent- police are interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents and calling the petitioner to the police station repeatedly and making her sit hours together without there being any crime registered against her. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions would submit that the respondent-police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties and they are not calling the petitioner to the police station. 5 5. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 6 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10585/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS