Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20426 (CHH)

SURENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1174/2026 · 2026-05-08

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21805 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Shri Justice Bibhu Datta Guru Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate WPS No. 1174 of 2026 Surendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Ramrup Yadav Aged About 50 Years Presently Posted As Teacher (Lb) At Govt. Middle School Jokapath, Block Shankargarh, District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director, Education Division And Secretary, Divisional Level Rationalization Committee Sarguja Division Ambikapur (C.G.) 4 - Collector And Chairman District Level Rationalization Committee District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.05.09 15:18:38 +0530 2 5 - District Education Officer And Secretary, District Level Rationalization Committee District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Shankargarh District- Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Petitioner appears through Video Conferencing (self attested copy of Aadhaar Card attached with the compromise petition) For Respondent(s) : Shri Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Dy. Govt Advocate along with Shri Mani Ram Yadav, District Education Officer, Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) AWARD (Passed on 09.05.2026) 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner sought reinstatement at Government Middle School, Jokapath along with consequential benefits including continuity of service. 2. However, the petitioner, appearing through video conferencing, submitted that he had already joined at the transferred place of posting on 01.01.2026 pursuant to the transfer order issued under the rationalization process and, therefore, he did not wish to press the petition. 3 3. In view of the submission made by the parties, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 4. The Court also recorded that the contesting parties had amicably settled the dispute and, finding the terms of compromise to be just, proper, and legal, accepted the settlement arrived at between them. 5. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 6. A copy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be made part of this award. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Malay Shrivastava) Judge - Lok Adalat Member - Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh shoaib