Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20416 (BOM)

SWATI GANESH SURYAWANSHI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

ABA/1543/2026 · 2026-10-13

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

918-ABA-1543-2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1543 OF 2026 Swati Ganesh Suryawanshi VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. K. N. Bhosale, Advocate for Applicant Mr. N. R. Dayama, APP for Respondents CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J DATE :OCTOBER 13, 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned Counsel for the Applicant makes grievance that though offence against him provides for maximum sentence of 7 years, the investigating officer has not issued notice under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. According to him, on this count itself Application deserves to be allowed. 2. Learned APP, on telephonic instructions from the I.O., makes statement that the investigating officer would issue notice to the Applicant under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. 3. In view of the said statement, nothing survives in the Application. Hence, Application stands disposed of. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani p. 1 2026:BHC-AUG:48584