Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20412 (RAJ)

SAYAD ABDUL ATIK S/O LT. SAYED MOHAMMAD ABDULLA v. SMT. RAHIMAN BANU @ RAHIMAN NISA W/O LT. SAYED SHOKET ALI

WMAP/523/2025 · 2026-02-05

Inderjeet Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5523] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 523/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12293/2023 Sayad Abdul Atik S/o Lt. Sayed Mohammad Abdulla, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 432/7, Phoolgali, Dargha Bazar, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Rahiman Banu @ Rahiman Nisa W/o Lt. Sayed Shoket Ali, R/o Oppsite Dargha Police Station, Moti Katala, Ajmer 2. Smt. Anisa W/o Lt. Sayed Masum Ali, R/o Opposte Dargha Police Station, Moti Katala, Ajmer 3. Israt Ali S/o Shoket Ali, R/o Phool Gali, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. L.L. Gupta. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order 05/02/2026 Heard on the application for correction in the order dated 14.08.2023 passed by this Court. Counsel for the applicant submits that due to inadvertence the name of the court has wrongly been mentioned in the prayer of the writ petition as ‘Rent Tribunal, Kota,’ in place of ‘Rent Tribunal, Ajmer. I have perused the record. [2026:RJ-JP:5523] (2 of 2) [WMAP-523/2025] In that view of the matter, the application is allowed and the word ‘Rent Tribunal, Kota’ be read as ‘Rent Tribunal, Ajmer’ in the order dated 14.08.2023. The order dated 14.08.2023 stands corrected accordingly. This order be treated to be part of the order dated 14.08.2023. (INDERJEET SINGH),J MG/24