Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20412 (AP)

Sangram Samiulla v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/10766/2024 · 2026-01-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010212922024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10766/2024 Between: 1. SANGRAM SAMIULLA,, S/O. LATE SANGRAM CHAND BASHA, MULSIM, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. VICE PRESIDENT, SUNNI MADINA MASJID COMMITTEE, RAGHAVENDRA COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.R 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEMMIGANUR URBAN POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SRI MADHUSUDHAN RAO, THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, YEMMIGANUR URBAN POLICE STATION, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SRI KHABEER, S/O. MAHABOOB BASHA, MUSLIM, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, MAHABOOB ENGINEERING WORKS, SHOP NO. 1-3661- M2, SHIVA CIRCLE , YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10766/2024 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the respondents Nos.4 and 5 in interfering with the civil dispute in respect of O.S.no.67 of 2024 on the file of the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vemmiganur, Kurnool District, pending between the petitioner and the respondent No.6 and consequently their action in interfering with the affairs of Sunni Madina Masjid, situated at Raghavendra colony, yemmiganur as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also being violative of Act 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently Direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute Sunni Madina Masjid which is subject matter of O.S.No.67 of 2024 on the file of the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), yemmiganur, Kurnool District pending between the petitioner and the respondent no.6 and others and not to harras them.…” 2. None represented on behalf of the petitioner. The present writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondent-police in interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the respondent police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the same, this Writ petition is disposed of. However, the respondent-police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. No order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.01.2026. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10766/2024 Dated.05.01.2026 UPS