Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20411 (JHR)

SANJU KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4918/2026 · 2026-07-14

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20774 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.4918 of 2026 ----- Sanju Kumari, daughter of Late Biro Oraon, resident of Village Mahuadand, Police Station Mahuadand, District Latehar, Jharkhand. … Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Mahuadand, P.O. & P.S.- Mahuadand District-Latehar, Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Latehar, P.O. & P.S.-Latehar, Dist.- Latehar. 4. Pradeep Oraon, S/o Sukhu Oraon, resident of Village Mahuadand, P.O.&P.S.-Mahuadand, District Latehar. 5. Bhakul Lohar, son of Late Libra Lohar, resident of Village Chatakpur, P.O. & P.S.- Mahuadand, District Latehar. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Roy, Advocate Mr. A. Sankalp, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, SC-I Mr. Mihir Kumar, AC to SC-I …...... 02 /14.07.2026: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the Sub- Divisional Officer in Land Restoration Case No. 03 of 2026 as the same is pending before Sub-Divisional Officer, Mahuadand, Latehar by filing an application for intervention since he claims that he is the necessary party in the said proceeding. 2. It is made clear that if the petitioner files any application for intervention the same should be considered on its own merits as per the law and if it is found that the petitioner is the necessary party and has interest over the property in any manner he should be allowed to intervene in the said proceeding. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 14.07.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 17.07.2026