A.K. @ ANEK MEENA S/O SHANKAR LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5216/2026 · 2026-04-08
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2041 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2041 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:14684] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.5216/2026 A.K. @ Anek Meena S/o Shankar Lal, R/o Village Tiba Dhani, Siroli, P.S. Shivdaspura, District Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Chhavi Chaturvedi, Adv. for Mr. Krishan Kant Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 08/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the accused-petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.606/2025, registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur City (East), District Jaipur City (East) for offences punishable under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of BNS.
2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably. It is further submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is in custody since long and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the
submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. He
[2026:RJ-JP:14684] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5216/2026] submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as several other cases have been registered against him.
4. I have considered the contentions.
5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially considering the fact that parties have resolved their dispute amicably and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - A.K. @ Anek Meena S/o Shankar Lal, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded.
8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to
[2026:RJ-JP:14684] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5216/2026] immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance.
10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court.
11. The observations made herein above are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-62