1 APHC010209372019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 365/2019 Between: 1. ABBIREDDY RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA RAO, HINDU, AGED 31 YEARS, CULTIVATION, DOOR NO.7-173, NEAR RICE MILL, NAGULAPALLI VILLAGE, U.KOTHPALLI MANDAL,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KADIMISETTI GANDHAMAMBA, W/O. VENKATA RAO, HINDU, AGED 34 YEARS, HOUSEWIFE, DOOR NO.1-77/2, BEHIND VINAYAKA TEMPLE, A.P. MALLAVARAM VILLAGE, GOLLAPROLU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. ABBIREDDY RAMA CHANDRA REDDY @ SRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O. APPARAO, HINDU, AGED 77 YEARS, CULTIVATION, DOOR NO.8-2-79, STUWARPETA, PITHAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. ABBIREDDY VENKATA RAO @ VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/O. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, HINDU, AGED 56 YEARS, CULTIVATION, DOOR NO.7-173, NEAR RICE MILL, NAGULAPALLI VILLAGE, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. ABBIREDDY APPA RAO, S/O. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, CULTIVATION, NAGULAPALLI VILLAGE, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2 4. ABBIREDDY BHAVANNARAYANA REDDY, S/O. RAMA CHANDRA REDDY, HINDU, AGED 50 YEARS, CULTIVATION, DOOR NO.4-102, NAGULAPALLI VILLAGE, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. SATYANARAYANA @ TRIVENI STYLING HERSELF AS ABBIREDDY SATYANARAYANAMMA TRIVENI, , W/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, DOOR NO.8-2-79, STUWARTPETA, PITHAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. A KRISHNAM RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO 2. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 365/2019 J U D G M E N T: 1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred by the appellants/ petitioners/ Plaintiffs challenging the dismissal order passed by the XII Additional District Judge, Pithapuram in I.A.No.1687 of 2018 in O.S.No.50 of 2014 dated 29.03.2019. 2. When the matter was listed on 27.11.2025, 08.01.2026, 12.02.2026 and on 12.03.2026 there was no representation on behalf of appellants. Finally, this court posted this matter today under the caption “dismissal for default’. Even today also, there is no representation. It shows that the Counsel for the Appellants is not interested to contest the matter. 3. Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA KS Dated .01.04.2026. 4 117 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 365/2019 DATED 01.04.2026 KS