SACHIN SINGH @ SACHIN KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3779/2026 · 2026-07-15
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20402 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20402 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:20930 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 3779 of 2026
------ Sachin Singh @ Sachin Kumar Singh, aged about 41 years, son of Dasrath Singh, resident of Village Tiuj, Kabilashi, P.O. and P.S. Daru, District Hazaribagh
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Special P.P.
------
02/15.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Daru P.S. Case No.70 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 307, 353, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 21 of MMDR Act, Rule 54 of JMMCR Rule, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and false allegations are made of throwing the driver of the informant, who happens to the Circle Officer, Daru, Hazaribag. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that serious allegations are there against the petitioner of interfering with the official duty of the informant and the petitioner is having four criminal antecedents and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected.
5.
In para 95 of the case diary, it has come that the petitioner is having four criminal antecedents and in the FIR, there is serious allegation against the petitioner of throwing the driver of the informant and interfering with the official duty of the informant and indulging in illegal transportation of sand, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Dated 15.07.2026 Anit
Uploaded 17.07.2026