2026:JHHC:20909 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3774 of 2026 ------ 1. Anrajiya Devi, age about 62 years, wife of Late Butan Yadav 2. Maya Devi, age about 41 years, wife of Sri Anand Yadav 3. Mamta Devi, age about 38 years, wife of Sri Bhardul Yadav 4. Anand Yadav, age about 43 years, son of Late Butan Yadav 5. Bhardul Yadav, age about 40 years, son of Late Butan Yadav All are resident of Village Dandai, P.O. and P.S. Dandai, District Garhwa .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Ms. Neelam Kumari, Advocate Ms. Sweta Kumari, Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar No.2, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Apurv Krishna, Advocate Mr. Gopal Krishna Sinha, Advocate Mr. Umesh Kumar Kashya, Advocate Ms. Chanchal Chhaya, Advocate ------ 02/15.07.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dandai P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners and the informant are agnates and the petitioners were doing the boundary wall on their land and the informant have reached the spot and interfered and for that free fight has occurred. He further submits that there are case and counter case and the injury has been found to be simple and in the FIR, the allegations are general and omnibus. On these grounds, she submits that the anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and the informant jointly oppose the prayer and submit that the allegations are there of assault against all the petitioners. 2026:JHHC:20909 5. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the petitioners and the petitioners and the informant are said to be agnates and the occurrence took place due to the land dispute and even the injury is found to be simple, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Garhwa, in connection with Dandai P.S. Case No. 30 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 15.07.2026 Anit Uploaded 17.07.2026