HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6625 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.151 of 2025, under Sections 212, 217, 231, 229, 61(2), 109(1), 352 of B.N.S., Police Station- Naseerpur, District- Firozabad. 3. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The FIR was lodged by the son of the applicant for gun shot injuries received by the applicant, however, the police after investigation has exonerated the accused persons and implicated the applicant and his son. The applicant has been implicated in two previous criminal cases, however, the same did not involved more than seven years of maximum punishment. He is in jail since 23.1.2026. It is further submitted that in case, the applicant is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. The Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for grant of bail and has contended that the applicant and his son in a bid to falsely implicate the accused named in the FIR have manufactured gun shot injuries, which was found out from the CDR and the location of the applicant and the co-accused. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the parties and perused the record. 6. From a perusal of the material on record, prima facie no case under Section 109 of BNS is made out against the applicant. The applicant is said to be the injured, who was manufacturing the injuries in a bid to falsely implicate the named accused in the FIR. Co-accused who is the informant of the case, Sher Singh has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.11.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. - 40668 of 2025 and the applicant is on the similar footings, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the accused-applicant- Chandan Singh, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions: i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sunil Vishal Singh, G.A. Chandan Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) ii. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity. iii. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial. iv. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted by the court concerned. 9. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. 10. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 11. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. May 6, 2026 Fahad BAIL No. 6625 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad