Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20399 (JHR)

BASUDEO MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1010/2023 · 2026-07-15

Anil Kumar Choudhary

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21012] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1010 of 2023 ------ 1. Basudeo Mahto, S/O – Late Luttu Mahto, Aged about 63 years. 2. Radhika Devi @ Manju Devi, S/O- Basudeo Mahto, Aged about 56 years, Both R/O- Sector-2/D Quarter No.3-144, Gali No.-7, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.- Balidih, District- Bokaro 3. Mahanand Mahto, S/O- Chhutan Mahto, Aged about 50 years, R/O- Sector-12 F, Quarter No.1250, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.- Balidih, District-Bokaro … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nitu Kumari, W/O- Kapil Kumar, R/O- Upper Chutia, Near Gramin Bank, P.O. & P.S.- Chutia, District- Ranchi … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. P.P. (Through V.C.) For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Sr. Advocate Mr. Siddharth Jain, Advocate ------ Order No:-07 Dated:-15-07-2026 Heard the learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned senior counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2. No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State and the learned senior counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2 submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-15.07.2026-Animesh/