Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20399 (CHH)

RAMSANJIVAN KUMHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPPIL/30/2026 · 2026-05-07

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21568-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPPIL No. 30 of 2026 1 - Ramsanjivan Kumhar S/o Sukhanandan Kumhar Aged About 48 Years R/o- Shanti Nagar Ward No.- 25, Janjgir District Janjgir Champa C.G. 2 - Chhotelal Kumhar S/o Bholaram Prajapati Aged About 60 Years R/o - Pandhe Para Ward No,- 13, Shivrinarayan District Janjgir Champa C.G. 3 - Rajesh Prajapati S/o Rajendra Prajapati Aged About 26 Years R/o - Ward No.-13, Kera Road Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir Champa C.G. 4 - Ajay Kumar Kumbhkar S/o Matlabi Kumbhkar Aged About 32 Years R/o Tusma Tusma Janjgir Champa Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa C.G. 5 - Arjun Kumbhkar S/o Ramlakhan Kumbhkar Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Tusma Tusma, Janjgir Champa Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary Under Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collectorate Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa C.G. 3 - Sub Divisional Office Rev- Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa C.G. 4 - Mineral Inspector / Assistant Mineral Officer Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Add. A.G. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.05.11 10:58:58 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 08.05.2026 1. Heard Mr. Nasimuddin Ansari, learned counsel for petitioners as well as Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General, appearing for the State/respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has filed I.A. No. 03/2026 i.e. application for exemption from depositing of security deposit. 3. The said application i.e. I.A. No.03/2025- Application for exemption from payment of security deposit stands rejected. 4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdrawn the present petition with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security amount. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after depositing the security deposit as per High Court Rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet