Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20397 (PNJ)

INTAJAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/27939/2026 · 2026-05-18

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-2793 IN THE (126) INTAJAR STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. respondents to of illegal deten position by ce including CCT order to save t 2. submitted tha 06.05.2026 (A mentioned in t 27939-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Daanish Mahajan, Advocate Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been ents to conduct fair and impartial inve l detention, extortion, criminal intimi by certain police officials and for pre g CCTV footage, call detail records a save the life and liberty of the petition At the very outset, learned cou d that the petitioner have recently (Annexure P-1) before responden ed in the present petition but the same JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-27939-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 18.05.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  ocate for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab been filed seeking directions to al investigation into the allegatios intimidating and abuse of official for preserving electronic evidence ords and mobile tower location in etitioner. d counsel for the petitioner has cently filed a representation on pondents raising his grievance as same has not yet been considered AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-2793 and no action stage, the petit to respondent decide the af necessary actio 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioner with order in accord  18.05.2026 Amit Sharma 27939-2026 (O&M) (2) action has been taken thereon. He fu e petitioner would be satisfied if appr ndent No.3-Senior Superintendent of the aforesaid representation filed b y action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 06.05.2026 r within a period of one month from t accordance with law and take necessa Whether speaking/reasoned:    He further submitted that at this f appropriate directions are issued ent of Police, Sangrur, Punjab to iled by the petitioner and take enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will t of the paper-book be supplied to er made by the petitioner, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.3 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-1) of the from today, by passing a speaking ecessary action, if so required. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.18 19:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.