Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 20391 (PNJ)
PARVEEN v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/21061/2026 · 2026-05-18
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20391 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 20391 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-21061-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.315 CRM-M-21061-2026 Decided on : 18.05.2026 Parveen
...... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Mr. Sutikshan Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
. Mr. D.V.Dhindsa, Advocate for the complainant. ***
, J (ORAL)
! "
## $%$
&
'()"%* $$%$+
%+,$-,- +,$-$ ,+-!"
#
"
.& $ !
/ 0 . /
1
.
)$2%30.
#
'() 4
&
.
MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.19 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-21061-2026 2 /
4
/
&
.
&
.
/ .
4 '()
0& '()
.
&
"
& .
1
&
. 5
$$%$+
5
. 6 & . &.
/
# . /& &#
&
&5
& / 4
/
# 5 &
. &
&&. .. &
However, she has not controverted the fact that the petitioner is a first time offender as he is not involved in any other case. + 4 .
/
&
.
&
*
. %. 6
6
. 6 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.19 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh
CRM-M-21061-2026 3 6 & .
. # . /& &
/
&
/ &
$ 7
(
2 )
1. 8& . 7
/
8& 97
#
. &&
&
.
.
&
$ 7
(
(
/ &
/
& &
&
&3 &
7 3
37: (
& 9
. ; .
,-
.. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No < & => 3" MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.19 17:04 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh