Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20390 (RAJ)

SAMIKSHA OLA D/O SH. KUNNI LAL OLA v. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

CW/19176/2025 · 2026-01-08

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:682] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19176/2025 Samiksha Ola D/o Sh. Kunni Lal Ola, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Vpo Kuloth Khurd, Tehsil-Surajgarh, District-Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Its Regional Officer, Ajmer Region Having Its Registered Office At Todarmal Marg, Ajmer (Rajasthan). 2. The Controller Of Examinations, Central Board Of Secondary Education-Ajmer Region, Having Its Office At Todarmal Marg, Ajmer (Rajasthan). 3. The Principal, St. Xaviers School, Bhiwadi, Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. David Mehla For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav Mr. Samrath Sharma, for respondent No.3. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 08/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that if the petitioner submits a representation seeking redressal of her grievances as raised in the present writ petition before the CBSE, the same would be duly considered, more particularly by relying upon the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Jigya Yadav vs. CBSE reported in (2021)7 SCC 535, decided on 03.06.2021. 2. Considering the limited submission made, the present writ petition is disposed of with the directions that the petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation along with all supporting [2026:RJ-JP:682] (2 of 2) [CW-19176/2025] documents before the CBSE for redressal of her grievances and in the event, the said representation is filed within a period of 15 days from today, the same would be decided by the CBSE within a period of four weeks thereafter giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. 3. It is made clear that the directions issued by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the Case of Jigya Yadav (supra) would be duly considered by CBSE while deciding the representation. 4. With the above directions, the present writ petition is disposed of. 5. All pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J Ravi Khandelwal - 41