Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20388 (AP)

K.Riyaz v. J SYAMALA RAO I.A.S.

CC/1043/2021 · 2026-03-08

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010214002021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1043/2021 Between: 1. K.RIYAZ, S/O.IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, WORKED AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY (RETD.), BUCHIREDDYPALEM MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. PATTAN ASLAM, S/O.MOHAMMED KHAN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, WORKED AS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY (RETD.), BATTEPADU VILLAGE, ATMAKUR MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. J SYAMALA RAO I A S, SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF A.P.,, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT., A P 2. K HARINARAYANA REDDY, CHIEF ENGINEER, NTR TELUGU GANGA PROJECT, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT., A.P. 3. N KRISHNA RAO, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, SOMASILA PROJECT CIRCLE OFFICE, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT., A.P. 4. P SURESH BABU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, S.P.DIVISION NO. I, SOMASILA PROJECT, NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT, A.P. 5. G SAI PRASAD I A S, IRRIGATION PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, A.P.SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI,GUNTUR 2 RRR, J & TCDS, J C.C.No.1043 of 2021 DISTRICT.,ANDHRA PRADESH 6. M MALLIKHARJUNA REDDY B E, CHIEF ENGINEER,NTR TELUGU GANGA PROJECT,TIRUPATHI,CHITTOOR DITSTRICT.,A.P. 7. B VENKATA RAMANA REDDY B TECH, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, SOMASILA PROJECT CIRCLE OFFICE,DARGAMITTA,NELLORE,NELLORE DISTRICT.,A.P 8. B DASARADHA RAMI REDDY M TECH, EXECUTIVE ENGINNER,S.P.DIVISION NO.I,SOMASILA PROJECT,NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT,A.P. RR 5 TO 8 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 06/10/25,VIDE IA NO-1/2025 IN CC NO-1043 OF 2021 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents for willful disobedience herein for violating the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP.No.5508 of 2020 dt.02.03.2020 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to bring the Respondents No.5 to 8 on record as proposed respondents and implead them as Respondents in this Petition, in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V S R MURTHY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA 2. 3 RRR, J & TCDS, J C.C.No.1043 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The 7th respondent is personally present in Court today and his presence is dispensed with. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of the Court, passed in W.P.No.5508 of 2020, dated 02.03.2020, have been complied with. 3. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 09.03.2026 MJA 4 RRR, J & TCDS, J C.C.No.1043 of 2021 251 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1043/2021 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 09.03.2026 MJA