Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 20385 (JHR)

RAGHAVENDRA KUMAR TRIVEDI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/3863/2025 · 2026-07-14

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:20848 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3863 of 2025 Raghavendra Kumar Trivedi, son of Late Kedar Nath Trivedi, resident of E- 5-1A, Sail City, New Pundaga, P.O. & P.S.-Jagarnathpur, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi 3. The Superintendent of Police, Ranchi 4. The Chief Executive Officer, M/s Sanjeevni Buildcon, having its office at Argora, Kathal More Road, P.O. & P.S.-Argora, Dist.-Ranchi, through Mrs. Anamika Nandi 5. The Director, M/s Sanjeevni Buildcon, having its office at Argora, Kathal More Road, P.O. & P.S.-Argora, Dist.-Ranchi, through Shyama Kishore Gupta 6. M/s Sanjeevni Buildcon through its CEO namely Anamika Nandi, having its office at Argora, Kathal More Road, P.O. & P.S.-Argora, Dist.-Ranchi … Respondent(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s): M/s Mahesh Tewari, Shwetang Kr. Tiwari, & Sanjay Kr Saw, Advocates For the State: Mr. Shivam Kumar, AC to AG ------ 10/14.07.2026 Heard the parties. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the Executing Court is not disposing of the Execution Case No. 22 of 2014, which is pending before the District Consumer Forum, Bokaro. It is his submission that though the distress warrant has been issued against the judgment debtor, but no action has yet been taken and the execution case is still pending. 3. Considering the aforesaid submission of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that if the petitioner has any grievance in respect of execution of distress warrant or slackness of the State Authorities, the petitioner can very well approach the District Consumer Forum, Bokaro. If the petitioner approaches the District Consumer Forum, Bokaro by filing an application in the aforesaid execution case, the District Consumer Forum, Bokaro will look into the grievance of the petitioner and will take necessary action to ensure that the order passed by the Consumer Forum in Complaint Case No. 54 of 2013 is complied with and the order is duly executed in its entirety. 4. It is expected that the District Consumer Forum, Bokaro will try to dispose of the application as early as possible. 5. The District Administration should cooperate, if some is necessary to execute the order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. Pending, interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 14th July, 2026 Anu/SKC-CP-02 Uploaded on 17/07/2026 Page-2.