$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010319962026 + RC.REV. 238/2026, CM APPL. 46718/2026 (Stay), CM APPL. 46719/2026 (Ex.), CM APPL. 46720/2026 (Addl.Doc) & CM APPL. 46721/2026 (Ex. From filing the complete trial court record) PAWAN KUMAR BHATIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija and Mr. Amaan Khan, Advocates along with Petitioner in Person along with his son, namely, Piyush Bhatia. versus SH SANJAY BANSAL AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Srishti Talwar & Mr. Radhey Shyam, Advocates with Respondent No. 1, namely, Mr. Sanjay Bansal, in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 28.09.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeking the following reliefs: “a) Allow the present Revision Petition under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 and set aside the impugned Order/Judgment dated 24.04.2026 passed by the Learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, North- West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in RC/ARC No. 17/2024, whereby the Learned Rent Controller dismissed the Revisionists' Application seeking Leave to Defend and allowed the eviction petition filed by the Respondent; b) Call for and peruse the records of RC/ ARC No. 17 /2024 from the Court of the Learned Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi; This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:49:40 AND/OR Pass such other and further order(s), direction(s), or relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, proper, and expedient in the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of justice.” 2. The Petitioner as well as the Respondent No. 1 are present in person in Court and are duly identified by their respective counsel. It is apprised by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties that the Respondent No. 2 had already been proceeded against ex parte before the learned Rent Controller. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem that the parties have arrived at a settlement inter se, and on instructions submit that in terms of the said settlement, the Petitioner would be vacating the subject premises within one (01) calendar year commencing from 30.09.2026 and ending on 30.09.2027. 4. It is further submitted, on instructions, that is it agreed as between the parties that a sum of Rs. 60,000/-would be paid before the seventh (7th) of each calendar month during the period of occupation. It is also agreed by the Petitioner that an Affidavit of Undertaking to this effect would be filed within a period of four (4) weeks from today. 5. The Petitioner also undertakes that in the event that said Affidavit is not filed, he would be liable to vacate the subject premises forthwith. 6. The Petitioner also consents to the Respondents initiating such proceedings or take such actions as may be permissible in law, including by way of contempt proceedings, in the event that any of the undertakings are violated by him. 7. Accordingly, this Court is of the view that no further orders are This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:49:40 required to be passed in the present Petition. 8. The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands disposed of in the above terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. SEPTEMBER 28, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/10/2026 at 11:49:40