Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2038 (KAR)

SRI KRISHNAIAH ALIAS KRISHNAMURTHY, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6046/2026 · 2026-02-24

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11387 WP No. 6046 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 6046 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI KRISHNAIAH @ KRISHNAMURTHY, SON OF KARLAIAH RAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT HULIVANA VILLAGE, YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 572 142. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PUNITH C, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 572 101. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 572 101. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11387 WP No. 6046 of 2026 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KUNIGAL TALUK, PIN CODE - 572 130. 5. THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT, PIN CODE - 572 130. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THE TAHSILDAR. 6. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, PIN CODE - 572 130. 7. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, HULIVANA VILLAGE, YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, PIN CODE - 572 130. 8. THE TALUK SURVESOR, KUNIGAL TALUK, PINCODE - 572 130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU.V, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PETITIONER AND FORM 53 REGISTER APPLICATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 08.04.1999 VIDE REFERENCE NO. 8526 AS PER ANNX-A AND B AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11387 WP No. 6046 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned HCGP takes notice for all the respondents. 2. After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, while also seeking liberty to give a proper representation to the Tahsildar or the Deputy Commissioner in the matter of correction of the survey number in the application said to have been filed by the petitioner in Form No.53 as on 08.04.1999. 3. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn by reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18