( 2026:JHHC:20928 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3719 of 2026 Ramcharan Yadav, son of Sukhdev Yadav, aged about-21 years, resident of Ward No. 08, village-Sugasankh, P.O. Hirodih, P.S. Jainagar and District- Koderma ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, A.P.P. 02/ 15.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026, registered under sections 191(2), 190, 352, 351(2), 262, 132, 317(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Koderma. 3. I.A. No. 9428 of 2026 has been filed for modification/correction in memo of anticipatory bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently it has been typed in para 6 of the memo of anticipatory bail application that petitioner is owner of the tractor however, fact remains that petitioner is driver of the tractor and in view of that prayer made in I.A, may kindly be allowed. 5. For the reasons stated in the I.A, prayer made in I.A, is allowed. 6. I.A. No. 9428 of 2026 is disposed of. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in para 6 of the memo of anticipatory bail application in course of day. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ( 2026:JHHC:20928 ) driver and allegations are made that petitioner has taken away the tractor forcefully from the custody of the police. He next submits that the said tractor is in possession of the owner and police has not tried to seized the said tractor. He submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 20 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 9. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of taking away the tractor forcefully from the custody of the police. 10. Considering that petitioner is driver of the tractor and it has been pointed out that the said tractor is in possession of the owner, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 20 of the petition and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Koderma, in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.15.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-